About Our Program
The University of California at Davis offers a graduate program in
Population Biology which leads to a Ph.D. Areas of specialization
include population growth, structure and dynamics (basic and applied);
population interactions (competition, predation, parasitism, and
mutualism); community ecology; food webs; biogeography; behavioral and
physiological ecology; life-history strategies; systematics; evolution;
population and quantitative genetics; and molecular evolution. In the
September 1995 survey of graduate programs by the National Research
Council, UC-Davis was placed fifth in the nation for ecology, evolution
and behavior. Most recently, in a U.S. News and World Report survey, "America's Best Graduate Schools 2007", the survey ranked UC Davis No. 1 in Biological Sciences Specialties: Ecology/Evolutionary Biology.
UC-Davis is particularly strong in the biological sciences.
In addition to the veterinary and medical schools, there are over 50
biological science departments (ranging from nematology and plant
pathology to epidemiology and enology), divisions and graduate groups
on campus, and more than half of the faculty are in biological fields.
This wealth of expertise greatly facilitates graduate education in
biology. Students have access to a wide range of courses and can consult with experts in
almost any area. There are currently 37 faculty
members in the Population Biology Graduate Group, with specialties from
molecular population genetics to community ecology and ant systematics.
All faculty members of the Population Biology Graduate Group
are also members of the Center for Population Biology. The Center
includes:
* 41 students in the Population Biology Graduate Group;
* 14 graduate students "affiliates" from outside of our program who are affiliated with Center faculty and
interested in population biology but earning their degrees in graduate
programs such as Ecology, Animal Behavior, or Entomology;
* 2 CPB Postdoctoral Research Fellows; and
* 8 postdoc "associates" affiliated
with Center faculty.
In addition to our interdisciplenary affiliations, the faculty host many sabbatical and research
visitors each year. Recent visitors have included:
|
Steve Arnold
University of Chicago |
David Ayre
University of Wollongong |
Nick Barton
University of Edinburgh |
Brian Charlesworth
University of Chicago |
|
Deborah Charlesworth
University of Chicago |
Andy Clark
Penn State University |
Joseph Felsenstein
University of Washington |
Ilka Hanski
Cornell University |
|
Rick Harrison
Cornell University |
Peter Kareiva
University of Washington |
Alexey Kondrashov
Cornell University |
Richard Lenski
Michigan State University |
|
Trevor Price
University of California, San Diego |
Douglas Schemske
University of Washington |
Wolfgang Stephan
University of Maryland |
Michael Wade
University of Chicago |
There are two weekly seminar series in population biology. The Thursday
"Topics in Ecology and Evolution" seminar series
features well-known speakers from off-campus, whereas the Tuesday
"Population Biology" seminar series
consists of informal talks by Center faculty, postdocs and graduate
students. In addition, many graduate programs sponsor seminars by
distinguished scientists, producing literally hundreds of biology
research seminars each year.
The Population Biology curriculum,
which includes a first-year core course (PBG 200A,B,C), "Mathematical
Methods in Population Biology" (PBG 231), and Monte Carlo seminars,
sets this graduate program apart from most others. PBG 200 is an
intensive year-long series of courses, taken by all first-year
students. They consist of formal lectures and discussion sessions with
two or three instructors each quarter. These courses provide a
sophisticated introduction to current knowledge in population genetics,
population dynamics, species interactions, community ecology,
quantitative genetics, speciation, and systematics. This intensive
course involves extensive interaction between faculty and students and
among the first-year students. The Monte Carlo seminars bring together
groups of Center for Population Biology graduate students, postdocs,
and faculty to discuss research topics in population biology or to
develop skills such as public speaking or grant writing.
Curriculum
OVERVIEW:
- A Guidance Committee is
assigned to each entering student to guide them through their first
year in the program.
- PBG 200: The
one-year core series of courses taken by all first-year students. The
course includes lectures and discussions.
- Supporting Courses:
All first-year students, except those explicitly exempted by their
Guidance Committee because of their previous mathematical training,
must take PBG 231, "Quantitative
Methods in Population Biology," in their first quarter. Students will
normally be required to take three additional courses as determined by
their Guidance Committees.
- Remedial Courses:
All students must take courses to fill any gaps in their background
identified by their guidance committee.
- Monte Carlos and
other seminars: Student must participate in at least two Monte Carlo
seminars during their first year and at least one each subsequent year.
Students are also expected to attend (and enroll in) the
Tuesday Population Biology seminar series (PBG 290) and the Thursday "Topics in Ecology and Evolution"
seminar series (PBG 292) every quarter that they are on campus.
- First-Year Exam:
A written exam is taken at the end of the first year to test mastery of
the material presented in PBG 200 and to assess the student's
suitability to continue in the program.
- Teaching Experience:
Each student is encouraged to have at least two quarters of experience
as a TA, normally before the qualifying exam. For more information please visit our Evolution and Ecology TA webiste.
- Qualifying Exam:
The qualifying exam is taken at the end of the second year (or the Fall
Quarter of the third year, at the latest) and is based on a written
research proposal.
- Dissertation Seminar:
After presentation of the dissertation, all students are required to
present a seminar based on the contents of their dissertation to the
graduate group.
- Units: A typical program will
involve 50-60 units of course work, including seminars.
- The Guidance Committee and the
First-Year Mentor
Each new student will be assigned a three-person Guidance Committee
when they arrive on campus. This committee is made up of the student's
first-year mentor (see below), a Population Biology Graduate Group
faculty adviser, and a third person with interests close to those
of the student. The committee will meet with new students within the
first week of Fall Quarter and together will agree on the courses
that will be required for graduation. These requirements will be recorded
on the First-Year
Guidance Committee Report form, which serves as a contract between
the Group and the student. This contract may be changed at any time
by mutual consent of the student and the Guidance Committee, recorded
by written notification of changes submitted to the staff graduate
adviser.
Every student who is accepted into the program is assigned
a first-year mentor who is typically the person with whom the student
intends to work. An official graduate adviser is not assigned until the
beginning of the second year. Students may request a different adviser
if, for any reason, they feel that they will be more successful with
someone other than their current adviser. In order to effect a change,
a student must have a change-of-adviser form signed by the PBGG Chair.
Completed forms are filed with the staff graduate adviser.
In the beginning of the second year, the first-year mentor
on the Guidance Committee is replaced by the student's major professor,
who may or may not be the same person. During the second year, the
Guidance Committee, in addition to its role in academic advising, has
the additional responsibility to recommend a committee for the
qualifying examination, which must be scheduled no later than the Fall
Quarter of the third year.
The Guidance Committee is charged with overseeing all
aspects of a student's academic life in the PBGG and should meet as
often as is useful, but at least once every year in Spring Quarter. At
the annual Spring meetings, the Committee will evaluate the student's
progress toward a degree and record their assessment on the Annual
Progress Report form.
- Supporting Courses
Students are normally expected to take three additional
courses as determined by their Guidance Committee. These courses may
consist of formal lecture courses, laboratory and field courses, or
graduate seminars (excluding one-unit seminars such as PBG 270,
PBG 290, and PBG
292), as appropriate to achieve a balance between training in
organismal biology and quantitative methods. Generally, these will
include at least two 100/200 level courses in mathematics and/or
statistics. More or fewer courses may be required by the Guidance
Committee depending on the student's background and interests.
- Remedial Courses
Students entering the graduate group are expected to have
completed a set of courses that are typical in undergraduate biology
majors. Certain courses are viewed as sufficiently important that
entering students who have not taken them will be required to do so.
These courses are:
- a one-year course in introductory biology for biology
majors,
- a one-year course in calculus,
- a course in statistics, and
- an upper-division course in genetics.
The Guidance Committee is charged with the assignment of courses that
will fulfill these requirements.
- Monte Carlo Seminars
Each student is expected to participate in the Monte Carlo
seminars sponsored by the Center for Population Biology and Population
Biology Graduate Group. First year students must participate in at
least two Monte Carlo seminars. After that, students must participate
in at least one Monte Carlo per year. Each quarter, all of the graduate
students and postdocs who want to participate in a Monte Carlo seminar
are assigned at random to the participating faculty. A topic of mutual
interest to the participants is chosen at the first meeting.
- First Year Examination
In June, during the period of Spring Quarter finals, all
first-year students will take a written examination based on the
contents of the six modules that make up the core curriculum. The
faculty in charge of the lecture modules will supply questions and
evaluate the answers. The questions may include material from the
discussion groups as well as the formal lectures. This written exam
takes the place of questions on general population biology during the
qualifying examination taken later in the student's academic career.
The exam is meant to identify weaknesses in a student's understanding
of population biology and to help determine what additional course work
or study might be appropriate. On occasion, the exam may be used to
dismiss a student from the program who, by failing to exhibit a mastery
of the material, is judged unsuitable for continuation in the graduate
group.
When the examination is completed, the examining committee
(the six module instructors) will reach one of three decisions for each
student: pass,
conditional pass with a requirement of further study
and examination on some aspect of the material, or fail.
In case of failure, the student must retake the written exam in
September. Failing the second exam will result in dismissal from the
graduate group.
- Qualifying Examination
The qualifying examination is intended to test the
student's ability to design and execute a research project leading to
significant publishable results. A research proposal provides a point
of departure for the examination. In that proposal the student must
demonstrate an ability to formulate general scientific questions and to
build and test hypotheses. The student must also demonstrate a thorough
understanding of the discipline encompassed by the proposal.
- Schedule of the Examination
Before taking the qualifying examination, students
must have completed all course requirements set by Graduate Studies,
the Population Biology Graduate Group, and the Guidance Committee.
Qualifying examinations must be taken no later than
the seventh
quarter after matriculation.
- Faculty Membership on the Examination Committee
A five-person committee will examine the student in
population biology and three other designated areas.
At least three of the examiners, including the chair,
must be members of the Population Biology Graduate Group. The student's
major professor is not eligible to serve on the examination committee.
The student, in consultation with the Guidance
Committee, will propose three examination areas (in addition to
population biology) representing subdisciplines of population biology.
These subdisciplines include behavior, population genetics, molecular
genetics, evolution, community ecology, systematics, conservation
biology, environmental physiology, mathematical theory in population
biology, statistical and experimental methods in population biology,
resource economics and management, paleontology, or the biology of a
particular taxon (e.g., mammalogy, ornithology, entomology,
invertebrate zoology). One faculty member will act as an examiner for
each of these areas. A fifth faculty member will be designated to chair
the qualifying exam.
The graduate adviser and master adviser will review
the recommendations and, on approval, will have the graduate program
staff forward them to the Dean of Graduate Studies, who officially
appoints the committee.
Given that the general area of population biology will
have already been extensively covered in the first-year exam, the
faculty member assigned the area of population biology will be expected
to examine the student in only those areas of population biology that
relate directly to the proposed dissertation research.
The primary role of the chair, who is not assigned a
specific area for questions, is to oversee the examination.
- Structure of the Research Proposal
The proposal will be a written document that follows
the style of an NSF research proposal. The proposal will be a maximum
of 15 single-spaced pages.
After a one-page summary, the proposal should present
a rationale for the proposed research. The body of the proposal should
focus upon a few important, related ideas that lead to a small number
of coherent objectives. The objectives should be possible to accomplish
within the student's graduate career.
All proposals will include some treatment of the
essential quantitative methods to be integrated into the research.
These include statistical analysis or other mathematical techniques.
A final section of the proposal should address the
broader scientific significance of the objectives, and future
directions that could be taken from different possible outcomes of the
proposed research. The "future directions" portion of the proposal
should be brief, outlining some courses of investigation that could
follow from possible outcomes of the research in the body of the
proposal.
- Preparation for the Exam: Student and Faculty
Responsibilities
The student will give the proposal to each member of
the committee no later than six
weeks prior to the examination.
No later than two
weeks prior to the exam, the student will discuss the proposal with
each faculty member. The faculty members should have read the proposal
carefully before this meeting and should be prepared to offer
substantive feedback, if necessary, to the student.
A "perfect" draft of the proposal is not an objective
of the examination process, and the student should not revise the
written document before the examination.
Instead, the proposal is seen as a focal point for
discussions about carrying out science in the areas chosen by the
student. The examination will proceed by working outward from the
proposed research, into related areas and ideas.
- Conduct of the Examination
A typical exam will begin with a 15- to 20-minute oral
presentation by the student of the research proposal. The next
component of the exam will be faculty questions pertaining to the
proposal and the broader scientific issues of the student's three
specialty areas.
In these discussions, the student should be able to
respond to faculty perceptions, reactions, and criticisms of the
proposal in some detail.
It is the student's responsibility to place the
proposed research within the broader context of science and it is the
responsibility of the examining committee to explore the student's
understanding of scientific concepts, issues, and techniques that
relate to the research.
- Results of the Examination
In accordance with University policy, there are three
outcomes for the qualifying examination: Pass,
Not Pass,
or Fail.
A failure will mean dismissal from the Graduate Group.
In case of a "Not Pass," the student will be allowed to retake the exam
a second time.
In the case of either a "Not Pass" or a "Fail," the
committee will provide a written explanation of its decision.
If a second examination is necessary, the possible
outcomes are "Pass" and "Fail." A "Fail" on the second exam will mean
dismissal from the Graduate Group.
A student dismissed from the Graduate Group may be
awarded an M.S. degree, if all course requirements have been
successfully fulfilled.
- Dissertation Committee
When a student passes their qualifying examination, their
Guidance Committee will propose a Dissertation Committee with at least
three members. At least two members, including the chair, must be
members of the Graduate Group. The committee will be appointed by the
Dean of Graduate Studies.
The student will meet with the committee at least once a
year to guide the research and review the student's progress. Contents
of the thesis must be approved by the committee at least six months
before the submission of the dissertation. In cases where a committee
member is not in residence, suitable alternative arrangements may be
made.
Insofar as it is consistent with the regulations of
Graduate Studies, the dissertation will normally be presented in a form
suitable for publication with minimal modifications. Students will be
encouraged to present their theses in the form of several manuscripts
suitable for publication in major peer-reviewed journals.
- Dissertation
Seminar and Defense
After presentation of the dissertation, all students are
required to present a seminar based on the contents of their
dissertation. Normally, the seminar will be given in the Tuesday Population Biology Seminar Series. If
this is not possible, the seminar may be scheduled for any convenient
time. A announcement of the seminar to the entire Population Biology
Graduate Group membership must be circulated at least one weak prior to
the seminar.
- Units
A typical program will usually involve about 50 to 60
units of course work, including seminars. (For example, 20 units for
the first-year core, 9-12 for additional courses and 20-26 seminar
units).
The University requires that a full-time student enroll
for 12 units each quarter. A balanced load should not include more than
16 units of 100 and 200 level courses in any quarter and not more than
9 units of graded course work in quarters when serving as a TA.
|